Zweli Mkhize blames former DG for Digital Vibes scandal

Embattled former well being minister Dr Zweli Mkhize has launched a recent authorized assault on the SIU and accuses his former director common of getting orchestrated his downfall.

Digital Vibes boss Tahera Mather (R) and former Well being Minister Zweli Mkhize. Image: Tahera Mather/Fb.

JOHANNESBURG – Embattled former well being minister Dr Zweli Mkhize has launched a recent authorized assault on the Particular Investigating Unit (SIU) and accuses his former director common of getting orchestrated his downfall.

Mkhize has requested the excessive court docket in Pretoria to declare the Digital Vibes report as illegal and unconstitutional.

In his supplementary founding affidavit, seen by Eyewitness Information, Mkhize endured along with his assertion that he was merely a sufferer of a smear marketing campaign orchestrated by the SIU.

He additionally needed the court docket to put aside the report. Within the doc, dated 18 March 2022, Mkhize additionally needed the SIU to pay the price of three senior counsels.

PLACING THE BLAME

Mkhize positioned the blame squarely on the door of former director common on the Well being Division Valuable Matsoso whom he painted as the actual wrongdoer within the appointment of Digital Vibes regardless that it was his shut associates who have been linked to the corporate.

Within the supplementary paperwork Mkhize defined that he and Matsoso had a tough relationship.

He additionally used submissions from head of the GCIS Phumla Williams to attach the dots between Matsoso and his former private assistant and shut affiliate Tahera Mather who was closely implicated within the report.

Mkhize claimed that Mather’s presence at authorities conferences on behalf of the Well being Division had preceded the Digital Vibes contract.

Mkhize mentioned the appointment of Mather on this regard would have been the only accountability of the previous director common.

“Ms Matsoso had a transparent motive and curiosity in implicating me,” claimed Mkhize, arguing that the SIU failed to contemplate the previous official’s want to level a finger at him to keep away from taking accountability for her alleged actions.

MKHIZE’S FUTURE ASPIRATIONS

The most recent transfer is seen as a part of Mkhize’s try to clear his identify forward of the ANC’s Nationwide Congress in December 2022. He resigned as well being minister after he was implicated within the R150 million Digital Vibes the place the contract was unlawfully awarded to his former aides and a number of the cash ended up benefiting Mkhize’s household.

Mkhize has been quietly working the bottom in KwaZulu-Natal as he builds up help with the intention of contesting one of many prime positions inside the governing get together’s management.

The timing of his newest court docket battle is broadly seen as Mkhize’s higher want to stay related within the eyes of ANC members, who would vote for the brand new management.

The SIU discovered that Mkhize, his household and a few of his shut associates benefited from the multimillion rand contract awarded to Digital Vibes for COVID-19 communications.

He approached the excessive court docket in October in search of to problem the report, claiming it was tainted by “stark irregularities,” and that there have been a number of breaches in processes, which included not giving discover or substantial data on a number of the issues he was questioned on.

IRRATIONAL

Within the newest court docket papers Mkhize flagged three most important points. First, that the SIU approached the matter with a closed thoughts and a predetermined end result. Secondly, that the SIU didn’t disclose hostile allegations and didn’t take his representations into consideration or report them to the president. Lastly the SIU report, mentioned Mkhize, erred in legislation arguing that it can’t level to any direct proof of misconduct on his half.

“I used to be certain by and acted by way of the choice truly taken by Cupboard, which required me [as health minister] to develop the NHI media technique,” defined Mkhize within the paperwork.

He questioned the SIU’s reliance on an alleged categorised decision by Cupboard, insisting there was no decision that GCIS would deal with the communication technique.

Mkhize additionally argued that the Cupboard decision was a categorised doc and subsequently the SIU couldn’t have relied on a doc it didn’t see or that which it had no proper to own. The previous minister mentioned this was proof that the findings in opposition to him have been irrational.

He mentioned the SIU’s responding affidavit confirmed it had a predetermined end result and approached the matter with a closed thoughts and in violation of the legislation, accusing it of breaching his rights to pure justice.

TIMING

Final yr Mkhize additionally accused the investigating physique, which institutes investigations after proclamations from the president, of destroying his political profession.

Mkhize additionally raised a problem with the timing of the SIU’s report.

He mentioned the SIU’s report was submitted to President Cyril Ramaphosa on the identical day that it held a follow-up assembly with him and 6 different affidavits the place crucial and related data was submitted.

“It is not possible for the SIU to have thought-about the proof and submissions earlier than submitting its ultimate report back to the president on the identical day,” mentioned Mkhize.

The SIU has refused to touch upon Mkhize’s second supplementary papers, saying these have been points which might be ventilated within the court docket.

Final week the investigating physique, in a separate matter involving Digital Vibes on the Particular Tribunal, instructed the court docket a collection of firms linked to Mkhize and his household have been used as a money-laundering scheme to divert cash from Digital Vibes.

It needed so as to add six different firms to its evaluation utility to put aside the contract value R150 million.

The SIU has 30 days to reply to Mkhize’s supplementary affidavit.

Source

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.