Greater than 25,000 sufferers lacking from Pfizer information… had been they deleted on function?

Image: More than 25,000 patients missing from Pfizer data… were they deleted on purpose?

Security information on 35,706 sufferers who participated in Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” trials has gone lacking, greater than probably deliberately as a part of an enormous cover-up.

Dr. Clare Craig posted on Twitter about what she describes as a “*huge* hole between Pfizer’s claims and what their newest information launch exhibits.”

The summary of Pfizer’s newest research claims that as of the deadline on October 9, a complete of 37,706 individuals had a median of at the very least two months of security information accessible after their second dose and contributed to the primary security information set.

Truthful sufficient. However in accordance with Dr. Craig, the figures don’t add up. The protocol was imagined to be that individuals obtained their first dose of a Fauci Flu shot upon enrollment, adopted by a second dose three weeks later. (Associated: Pfizer is being overwhelmed with aspect impact reviews from its covid pictures.)

“So to have 2 months observe up after the second dose would imply being recruited greater than 11 weeks earlier i.e. on or earlier than twenty fourth July 2020,” Dr. Craig wrote as a part of a prolonged exposé of tweets in regards to the matter.

“The primary affected person to be recruited was recruited on twenty seventh July 2020 … So the quantity who had 2 months observe up after the 2nd dose was an enormous fats zero.”

What else is Pfizer mendacity about?

There may be an especially distant likelihood that this was merely the world’s worst typo, and that Pfizer meant two months after the primary dose. However what then?

Pfizer’s newest launch features a doc masking the primary 360 sufferers who had been recruited from July 27-30. For these first 4 days, 90 individuals per day, on common, had been added to the rolls.


Pfizer has since launched a doc on the primary 6,000 sufferers recruited from July 27 to August 14, which averages one other 316 sufferers per day added between day 5 via day 19.

“To have 2 months observe up on ninth Oct we might be beneficiant and say you solely want 8 weeks or 56 days,” Dr. Craig writes. “Which means you’d have to be recruited on 14th August.”

“However they didn’t declare all of them had 2 months observe up they claimed that was a median.”

By August 14, solely 6,000 sufferers had been recruited. Two months might nonetheless be the median, on this state of affairs, if one other 6,000 sufferers had been recruited after that day, which might carry absolutely the most variety of sufferers with two-month follow-ups after the primary dose to 12,000.

The issue is that Pfizer claims that on the deadline of October 9, a complete of 37,706 individuals had a median of at the very least two months of security information accessible after their second dose of the shot, this contributing to the first security information set.

“How can this declare be so unsuitable?” Dr. Craig asks.

This may hardly be the primary time that Pfizer made a “mistake” with the info or flat-out lied in regards to the figures to make its merchandise seem safer and simpler than they are surely.

The covid jab fiasco is arguably probably the most disturbing part of Pfizer’s polluted portfolio of drug choices. And the reality simply continues to circulate as consultants unpack the info reviews and uncover anomalies similar to this that beg extra questions than solutions as to what’s actually occurring with all this.

“They knew of the negative effects and intentionally withheld the knowledge,” wrote somebody at about how Pfizer might be masking up affected person information in an try to cover these negative effects from the general public.

“They (Pfizer) are killers of the worst form and deserve capital punishment, not jail time.”

The most recent information about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” could be discovered at Vaccines.information.

Sources for this text embrace:


Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.