Lawmakers line as much as urge Supreme Courtroom to toss out Biden's unconstitutional COVID-19 vaccine mandate

Image: Lawmakers line up to urge Supreme Court to toss out Biden’s unconstitutional COVID-19 vaccine mandate

Dozens of lawmakers have signed onto an amicus temporary urging the U.S. Supreme Courtroom to toss out Joe Biden’s unconstitutional COVID-19 vaccine mandates for federal staff, contractors and lots of non-public companies.

As reported by LifeSite Information, 183 lawmakers have signed the “pal of the court docket” temporary urging the justices to toss the mandates, which have been issued by the Occupational Security and Well being Administration (OSHA) in November.

“[OSHA] was by no means meant to be the well being police,” the lawmakers wrote, in line with the outlet. “Furthermore, obligatory vaccinations don’t cease people from contracting and transmitting COVID-19.

“Vaccinated staff can nonetheless contract and transmit COVID-19, together with the brand new Omicron variant. On condition that truth, imposing masking and testing restrictions solely on unvaccinated staff is not sensible as a result of all staff no matter vaccination standing stay potential carriers and transmitters of the virus,” the lawmakers added.

The letter got here forward of oral arguments earlier than the excessive court docket this week in a case introduced by Ohio and the Nationwide Federation of Small Companies, each of that are suing over OSHA’s mandate for corporations with 100 or extra workers requiring staff to both be vaccinated or undergo weekly testing.

As well as, the justices heard arguments in a case pushing again on the federal mandate for healthcare staff who work at amenities that obtain Medicare and Medicaid funding.

“Congressional members have an curiosity within the powers they delegate to companies not being abused,” the lawmakers famous in the temporary. “The legislative authority vested within the federal authorities belongs to Congress, not the Govt department. On this case, the promulgation by the Occupational Well being and Security Administration (OSHA) of a sweeping, nationwide vaccine mandate on companies intrudes into an space of legislative concern far past the authority of the company.”


The letter additionally cites the Biden regime for exploiting OSHA’s seldom-used “emergency non permanent normal” provision to difficulty the mandates, saying it falsely creates a guise of legality and including that OSHA has by no means had such authority and none has been delegated to the company, implicitly or explicitly, by the Legislative Department.

“Briefly, there isn’t any mouse gap during which Congress may have even tried to cover the elephant of the ETS mandate right here,” they wrote.

As well as, the lawmakers stated that there are severe, reputable issues with the efficacy of the varied vaccines, however that even when they have been extra dependable and efficient, mandates and such have traditionally rested with states, not the federal authorities, and positively not the Govt Department.

“With out clear congressional authority within the regulatory scheme for such an growth of company authority into the realm of state police powers, it might not be assumed to exist,” they wrote.

“Furthermore, the sudden ‘discovery’ of authority beneath the OSHA Act confirms that it was by no means supposed to displace state authority on this space,” the lawmakers added.

Throughout oral arguments this week, two of the court docket’s liberals made some false assumptions relating to the virus and vaccines, as The Federalist reported:

Justice Elena Kagan prompt that getting the vaccine reduces the unfold of COVID-19, a doubtful declare that’s contested by the quickly rising variety of breakthrough circumstances worldwide. Kagan’s opinion is that “that is the coverage that’s most geared to stopping all this.”

“There’s nothing else that may carry out that operate higher than incentivizing individuals strongly to vaccinate themselves. So, , no matter needed means, no matter grave means, why isn’t this needed and grave?” she requested.

“We don’t contest that COVID is a grave hazard,” Nationwide Federation of Impartial Enterprise legal professional Scott Keller responded. “However when the ability for it to be needed… an company has to think about and clarify alternate options.”

Justice Stephen Breyer additionally appeared to counsel that being vaccinated would cease the unfold of the virus, claiming the argument that extra individuals would go away the workforce as a result of mandates was invalid as a result of “extra could give up once they uncover they must work along with unvaccinated others as a result of which means they could get the illness.”

Sotomayor additionally falsely claimed that “hospitals are nearly all full capability,” including that greater than 100,000 youngsters are hospitalized with COVID and on ventilators.

“The present nationwide pediatric COVID census per HHS is 3,342. Many/most incidental,” American Dedication chair Phil Kerpen famous in response.

Sources embrace:



Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.